RAM; more or less? August 28th, 2008, 8:52am
Home Calendar Search Register Login
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Computer Q&A Board    Answers    Windows  ›  RAM; more or less?

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    RAM; more or less?
triuno
Posted: February 23rd, 2007, 9:10am Report to Moderator
Baby Member


Posts: 36
Due to Microsoft VISTA release I think we have to move there. It means apparently a new computer. I have planned to use a ASUSTEK  Commando motherboard. Ok. But the question arising is: how much RAM can VISTA or any applications actually use is it 2 or 3 or 4 Gbyte? My question is in order not to spend more than necessary on memory.
As long as the 32 bit OS cannot use the memory it must be a bad investment, right?
Anybody got an idea??? ( 64 bit can use 4 Gbyte RAM right? ).
Logged Offline
e-mail
Free Weekly Newsletter
Learn Tips about your Computer
from a Trusted, Knowledgeable Source


Subscribe to Ray's Computer Tips by entering your email address below and clicking on the button. We have a No Spam policy

This Forum brought to you by



No Hype, No Glitz
Just Great Software
Forever Free Updates
dlwolff0
Posted: February 24th, 2007, 3:55am Report to Moderator
Big Member



Posts: 457
Reputation: 0.00%
Most often recommended for Vista is 2 GB of RAM and a minimum of 256 MB RAM on your video card.
The 32 bit Windows 2000 and XP can both support 4 GB of RAM.
The 64 bit Windows Vista Home Basic can support 8 GB, Home Premium 16 GB, Business, Enterprise and Ultimate 128 GB.
Most motherboards for home use now support up to 8 GB.
If you want to use all the bells and whistles in Vista, I would say 2 GB at least. I wouldn't try to run it with less than 1 GB, unless you are prepared to limp instead of run.
Logged Offline
e-mail Reply: 1 - 4
triuno
Posted: February 24th, 2007, 8:32am Report to Moderator
Baby Member


Posts: 36
Ok, thank you. I have planned to go for 4GB. Lets see what it will come of it.
Any suggestion of a video card, Matrox? other see below?, mostly office and WEB related work, not much gaming.
Here it could be:
Asustek Commando
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 ( I like Intel not AMD, my choice ).
Ki, 2048MB KiT, 1024+1024MB 667MHz DDR2-RAM DIMM, 4GB ( or 800 if applic & availab)
Seagate Barracuda SerialATAII 7200.10 320.0GB 16MB , 4 pcs
Club-3D GF 7800GS 256M tv A card
Zahlman cooler 4 pcs
+some bits & pcs.
Logged Offline
e-mail Reply: 2 - 4
dlwolff0
Posted: February 25th, 2007, 4:16am Report to Moderator
Big Member



Posts: 457
Reputation: 0.00%
On the memory, most of the reviews I have seen say that 667 mhz is the better choice. The performance increase with 800 mhz is not great enough to offset the price difference involved.
Most of the core 2 duo boards are set up to use PCI Express video cards.
Note:
Using a serial ATA hard drive requires entering a special driver during the Windows installation for all of the boards I have seen reviewed since that bus is controlled by a different chipset than the IDE bus.
Logged Offline
e-mail Reply: 3 - 4
triuno
Posted: February 25th, 2007, 9:03am Report to Moderator
Baby Member


Posts: 36
Hello, thank you for your answer.

Have you seen: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/aa366778.aspx

there I found some info on this issue.
Logged Offline
e-mail Reply: 4 - 4
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Windows  [ previous | next ] Switch to:

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is off
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on

Powered by E-Blah Platinum 9.6 © 2001-2006